Foreign Exchange Market: An Introduction
3.1 Introduction to Forex Market:
For most of us, the focal point of understanding international finance
revolves around foreign exchange market. The foreign exchange market (also known
as the currency, forex, or FX) is where currency trading takes place. It is a market
where banks, companies, exporters,
importers, fund managers, individuals, central banks of different countries buy
and sell of foreign currencies.
Forex trading involves a foreign exchange transaction, defined as the
simultaneous buying of one currency and selling of another currency. As forex
rates are quoted in pairs, e.g. Euro/US$, US$/Japanese Yen, US$/INR, etc., a
trader trading in forex sells one of the currency pair and buys the other.
As the subject progresses, we will develop more understanding about
which currency is bought and which currency is sold and other aspects of forex
trading.
The forex market is an ongoing 24-hour, 365 days year market. Trading in
forex market does not necessarily involve an exchange. Hence, the trading goes
on the over-the-counter
market (OTC market henceforth). Major
foreign currency trading centers are located in London,
Tokyo, New York. As the markets remain open at different time on a given day,
normally GMT is used to refer the trading hours at different locations. For
example, the trading duration in Asia is from GMT.00.00 till GMT 08.00. Trading
duration in London is during GMT 07:00 till GMT 15:00. Trading in USA commences
during GMT 13.00 till GMT 22.00. Trading in London starts at GMT 8.00 and ends
at GMT 17.00. Trading in Tokyo starts in GMT 0.00 ( midnight) and ends GMT
9.00.
A video available at http://video.yahoo.com/watch/4516514/12100450 very clearly explains the
relationship between GMT and forex trading hours at different location. The
volume of forex trading at given point of time is correlated with the number of
markets opened at that time.
Presently, the FX market is one of the largest and liquid financial
markets in the world, and includes trading between large banks, central banks,
currency speculators, corporations, governments, financial institutions,
exporters and importers. The average daily volume in the global foreign
exchange and related markets is continuously growing. The daily turnover was reported
to be over US$3.2 trillion in April 2007 by the Bank for International Settlements (BIS). The Since then, the market has continued to grow.
According to Euromoney's annual FX Poll, trading volumes in USA grew a
further 41% between 2007 and 2008.
The Bank for International Settlements undertakes triennials survey to
regarding various facets of foreign exchange market. According to the last
survey conducted in 2007, average daily turnover in global foreign exchange
markets is estimated at $3.2 trillion. It has grown in an unprecedented 69%
compared to 2004. The Bank for International Settlements is regular with the
publication of these triennial surveys. The readers must check the official
website for the latest survey report to get update on details discussed in this
module.
As the 2007 report, average daily turnover of US$3.2 trillion comes from
foreign exchange spot, forward and swap transactions.
•
US$1.005 trillion in spot transactions
•
US$362 billion in outright forwards transactions
•
US$1.714 trillion in foreign exchange swaps
•
US$129 billion estimated gaps in reporting
The spot
market relates to immediate purchase and sale of foreign currency
while in a forward
transaction parties agree to buy and sell
foreign currency later. In swap transactions, parties agree to swap
payment and receipt of foreign currency over a specified
period. These last two sentences very briefly summarize the difference between
spot, forward and swap transactions. In later modules , these contracts are
explained in detail.





3.2 Foreign Exchange Market, Trading
Volumes :
Foreign exchange market is one of the fastest growing segments in the
financial world. Details given in Table 2.A extracted from the “Triennial Central
Bank Survey December 2007 Foreign exchange and derivatives market
activity in 2000” prepared by Bank of International Settlement (BIS) indicates the
growth of the forex market.
The 2007 survey shows an unprecedented rise in activity in traditional
foreign exchange markets compared to 2004. Average daily turnover rose to $3.2
trillion in April 2007, an increase of 69% at current exchange rates as given
in Table 3.A.
Table 3.A. Global foreign exchange market
turnover (*)
Daily averages in
April, in billions
|
||||||
ofUS$
|
2004
|
|||||
YEAR
|
1992
|
1995
|
1998
|
2001
|
( **)
|
2007
|
Spot
transactions
|
394
|
494
|
568
|
387
|
631
|
1,005
|
Outright
forwards
|
58
|
97
|
128
|
131
|
209
|
362
|
Up to 7
days
|
…
|
50
|
65
|
51
|
92
|
154
|
Over 7
days
|
…
|
46
|
62
|
80
|
116
|
208
|
Foreign
exchange swaps
|
324
|
546
|
734
|
656
|
954
|
1,714
|
Up to 7
days
|
…
|
382
|
528
|
451
|
700
|
1,329
|
Over 7
days
|
…
|
162
|
202
|
204
|
252
|
382
|
Estimated
gaps in reporting
|
44
|
53
|
60
|
26
|
106
|
129
|
Total “traditional” turnover
|
820
|
1,190
|
1,490
|
1,200
|
1,900
|
3,210
|
Turnover at
April 2007 exchange
|
||||||
rates(
***)
|
880
|
1,150
|
1,650
|
1,420
|
1,970
|
3,210
|
1 Adjusted for local &
cross-border double-counting. Due to incomplete
breakdown,
components do not always sum to totals. 2. Date for 2004 have been revised.
3 Non-US dollar legs of foreign
currency transactions were converted from current
US
dollar amounts into original currency amounts at
average exchange rates for April of each survey year and then reconverted into
US dollar amounts at average April 2007 exchange rates.
Table 3.A indicates that forex
swaps have grown strongest compared to the other two, i.e, spot and forward.
Table 3.B indicates the
percentage share of different currencies in average daily turnover during 2007. As
expected, US dollar has the highest average daily turnover of 86% followed by
Euro (37%) and Yen( 19%). Surprisingly the sum total of percentage of these
currencies is 142% !!! The clue lies in the Table 3.B.
In addition, it is heartening to see that Indian currency average daily
turnover has increased from 0.3% to 0.7%. So also the Chinese Renminbi.
Table 3.B:Currency distribution of
reported foreign exchange market turnover(*)
Percentage
shares of average daily turnover in April 2007
|
2004
|
||
2001
|
(**)
|
2007
|
|
US
dollar
|
90.3
|
88.7
|
86.3
|
Euro
|
37.6
|
36.9
|
37
|
Yen
|
22.7
|
20.2
|
16.5
|
Pound
sterling
|
13.2
|
16.9
|
15
|
Swiss
franc
|
6.1
|
6
|
6.8
|
Australian
Dollar
|
4.2
|
5.9
|
6.7
|
Canadian
dollar
|
4.5
|
4.2
|
4.2
|
Swedish
krona
|
2.6
|
2.3
|
2.8
|
Hong
Kong dollar
|
2.3
|
1.9
|
2.8
|
Norwegian
krone
|
1.5
|
1.4
|
2.2
|
New
Zealand dollar
|
0.6
|
1
|
1.9
|
Mexican
peso
|
0.9
|
1.1
|
1.3
|
Singapore
dollar
|
1.1
|
1
|
1.2
|
Won
|
0.7
|
1.2
|
1.1
|
Rand
|
1
|
0.8
|
0.9
|
Danish
krone
|
1.2
|
0.9
|
0.9
|
Rouble
|
0.4
|
0.7
|
0.8
|
Zloty
|
0.5
|
0.4
|
0.8
|
Indian
rupee
|
0.2
|
0.3
|
0.7
|
Renminbi
|
0
|
0.1
|
0.5
|
New
Taiwan dollar
|
0.3
|
0.4
|
0.4
|
Brazilian
real
|
0.4
|
0.2
|
0.4
|
All currencies
|
200
|
200
|
200
|
Emerging
market currencies (***)
|
16.9
|
15.4
|
19.8
|
(*) Because two currencies are involved in each transaction, the sum of
the percentage
shares of
individual currencies totals 200% instead of 100%. Adjusted for local and
cross-border double-counting. (**) Data for 2004 have been revised.
(***)
Defined as the residual after accounting
for the
top eight currencies and the New Zealand dollar and the Danish krone.
Table 3.C highlights foreign exchange market turnover by
currency pair.
Table 3.C: Reported foreign exchange
market turnover by currency pair (*) http://www.bis.org/publ/rpfxf07t.pdf
Daily
averages in April, in billions of US dollars and per cent
|
||||||
YEAR
|
2001
|
%
|
2004( **)
|
%
|
2007
|
|
Amount
|
Amount
|
Share
|
Amount
|
Share
|
Amount
|
% Share
|
US dollar/euro
|
354
|
30
|
503
|
28
|
840
|
27
|
US
dollar/yen
|
231
|
20
|
298
|
17
|
397
|
13
|
US
dollar/sterling
|
125
|
11
|
248
|
14
|
361
|
12
|
US
dollar/Australian dollar
|
47
|
4
|
98
|
5
|
175
|
6
|
US
dollar/Swiss franc
|
57
|
5
|
78
|
4
|
143
|
5
|
US
dollar/Canadian dollar
|
50
|
4
|
71
|
4
|
115
|
4
|
US dollar/Swedish krona
|
||||||
(***)
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
…
|
56
|
2
|
US
dollar/other
|
195
|
17
|
295
|
16
|
572
|
19
|
Euro/yen
|
30
|
3
|
51
|
3
|
70
|
2
|
Euro/sterling
|
24
|
2
|
43
|
2
|
64
|
2
|
Euro/Swiss
franc
|
12
|
1
|
26
|
1
|
54
|
2
|
Euro/other
|
21
|
2
|
39
|
2
|
112
|
4
|
Other
currency pairs
|
26
|
2
|
42
|
2
|
122
|
4
|
All
currency pairs
|
1,173
|
100
|
1,794
|
100
|
3,081
|
100
|
(*)
Adjusted for local and cross-border double-counting. (**)Data for 2004 have
been revised.
(***)The
US dollar/Swedish krona pair could not be separately identified before 2007
and is
included in “other”.
As usual, US dollar/Euro is the most preferred currency pair followed by
US dollar/Yen and US dollar/Pound Sterling. However, the percentage share of US
dollar/Euro pair is going down – from 30% in 2001 to 27% in 2007.
Table 3.D indicates
the distribution of average daily turnover of each currency based on spot,
forward and swaps transactions. For some currencies,
the spot transactions is
highest ( like Indian Rupees, Chinese Renmimbi, Turkish Lira etc.) while for
others swap transactions have the highest percentage ( like US dollar,
Australian Dollar, Swedish Krona etc.).
This difference clearly indicates the degree of development of forex
market in different currencies. Currencies with higher percentage of swap contract indicate
the maturity of the currency market. In addition, currencies with higher
percentage in spot market may be experiencing greater degree of capital
control, preventing traders from these markets to enter into long-term
contracts.
Table 3.D Reported foreign exchange
turnover by currency and instrument
Percentage shares of
average daily turnover in April 2007
|
|||
Spot
|
Outright
|
Foreign Exchange
|
|
Forwards
|
Swaps
|
||
US dollar
|
29.7
|
10.9
|
59.4
|
Euro
|
36.9
|
12.1
|
51.1
|
Yen
|
40.4
|
12.1
|
47.5
|
Pound sterling
|
32.5
|
10
|
57.4
|
Swiss franc
|
42.2
|
10.1
|
47.7
|
Australian dollar
|
25.7
|
10
|
64.3
|
Canadian dollar
|
29.7
|
11.8
|
58.6
|
Swedish krona
|
20.7
|
10
|
69.3
|
Hong Kong dollar
|
18.4
|
7
|
74.6
|
Norwegian krone
|
18.4
|
9.7
|
71.9
|
New Zealand dollar
|
29.4
|
11.3
|
59.3
|
Mexican peso
|
37.4
|
11.7
|
50.9
|
Singapore dollar
|
22.5
|
7.9
|
69.6
|
Won
|
44.7
|
29.4
|
25.9
|
Rand
|
19.9
|
12.1
|
68
|
Danish krone
|
21.8
|
10.3
|
67.9
|
Rouble
|
70.7
|
5
|
24.3
|
Zloty
|
20
|
10.9
|
69.1
|
Indian rupee
|
42.6
|
27.5
|
29.8
|
Renminbi
|
61.4
|
31.3
|
7.4
|
New Taiwan dollar
|
47.1
|
40.6
|
12.3
|
Brazilian real
|
50.2
|
47.3
|
2.5
|
Forint
|
34.1
|
15.7
|
50.2
|
Czech koruna
|
23.8
|
20.9
|
55.3
|
Baht
|
18.9
|
13.3
|
67.8
|
Turkish lira
|
61.4
|
11.4
|
27.2
|
Philippine peso
|
36.9
|
32.5
|
30.5
|
Rupiah
|
43.7
|
39.3
|
17
|
All currencies
|
32.6
|
11.7
|
55.6
|
1
Adjusted for local and cross-border double-counting.
Table 3.E shows the major countrywise average daily foreign exchange
turnover. The major countries are
Australia, Hong Kong, Japan, Singapore, Switzerland, United Kingdom and USA. It
is to be noted here that percentage column for all countries for a given year
do not add upto 100% as some country details have been deleted from the master
document to arrive at this table.
Table 3.E Major Countrywise Foreign Exchange Daily Average
Turnover
1998
|
2001
|
2004
|
2007
|
|||||
Amou
|
%
|
Amou
|
%
|
Amou
|
%
|
Amou
|
%
|
|
nt
|
nt
|
nt
|
nt
|
|||||
Australia
|
47
|
2.4
|
52
|
3.2
|
102
|
4.2
|
170
|
4.3
|
Canada
|
37
|
1.9
|
42
|
2.6
|
54
|
2.2
|
60
|
1.5
|
China
|
0
|
0.0
|
0
|
0.0
|
1
|
0.0
|
9
|
0.2
|
France
|
72
|
3.7
|
48
|
3.0
|
64
|
2.6
|
120
|
3.0
|
Germany
|
94
|
4.8
|
88
|
5.5
|
118
|
4.8
|
99
|
2.5
|
HongKong
|
79
|
4.0
|
67
|
4.1
|
102
|
4.2
|
175
|
4.4
|
India
|
2
|
0.1
|
3
|
0.2
|
7
|
0.3
|
34
|
0.9
|
Japan
|
136
|
6.9
|
147
|
9.1
|
199
|
8.2
|
238
|
6.0
|
Korea
|
4
|
0.2
|
10
|
0.6
|
20
|
0.8
|
33
|
0.8
|
Russia
|
7
|
0.4
|
10
|
0.6
|
30
|
1.2
|
50
|
1.3
|
Saudi
Arabia
|
2
|
0.1
|
2
|
0.1
|
2
|
0.1
|
4
|
0.1
|
Singapore
|
139
|
7.1
|
101
|
6.2
|
125
|
5.2
|
231
|
5.8
|
Switzerland
|
82
|
4.2
|
71
|
4.4
|
79
|
3.3
|
242
|
6.1
|
United
|
637
|
32.5
|
504
|
31.2
|
753
|
31.0
|
1,359
|
34.1
|
Kingdom
|
||||||||
United
States
|
351
|
17.9
|
254
|
15.7
|
461
|
19.2
|
664
|
16.6
|
Total
|
1,969
|
100
|
1,616
|
100
|
2,429
|
100
|
3,988
|
100
|
Table 3.E indicates that Japan’s daily average foreign exchange
turnover is going down while countries like
Switzerland, Australia and Hong Kong are showing an increasing trend. It is
also interesting to note that foreign exchange turnover percentage in United
Kingdom is turnover almost double the size that of United States—proving that
London still enjoys status of global financial hub than New York.





3.3: Evolution of Foreign Exchange Market and Foreign
Exchange System:
Since time immemorial, commodity money was used during barter system.
From a wide variety of commodities, gold, silver, silk and bronze became
standardized commodity money. During 17th century, countries and kingdoms started using coins as the medium of
exchange. These coins had their own intrinsic value that was not related to any
commodity.
Normally coins were made up gold, silver or bronze. Some other unusual
materials like stone and limestone and slate were also used. Can anyone imagine
-- Coins were traded weighing 8800 lbs! Box 3.1 has some interesting facts about Rai stones.
The content of gold, silver or bronze in a coin measured the intrinsic value of
these coins, hence the exchange rate between coins was governed by the amount
of gold /silver/bronze content of the coins. When an individual received/paid a
coin, it meant that he was giving/receiving a certain weight of metal backed by
these currencies. The value of the coins also influenced by intangibles
associated these coins as mentioned in Box 2.2
By the end of 17th century, countries started using paper money. Though paper money had
its presence in China from 1050 till 1400, paper currency became accepted
globally only during 17th century. Like the coins, the paper money was also backed by gold and
silver. Exchange rate between paper money was determined by the amount of
gold/silver backed by respective paper money. It is worth mentioning that,
different countries started introducing paper money at different point of time
between 10th and 17th century.
Box 3.1 : Rai Stones as Coins
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rai_stones
Rai stones are large, circular stone disks carved out of limestone in
the island of Yap, Micronesia. Locals have used these stones as a form of
unusual currency, a "stone money." Rai stones are circular disks
carved out of limestone with a large hole in the middle. The size of the stones
varies widely; the largest are 3 meters (10 ft) in diameter, 0.5 meters (1.5
ft) thick and weigh 4 metric tons (8,800 lb). The extrinsic (perceived) value
of a specific stone is based not only on its size and craftsmanship but also on
the history of the stone. If many people - or no one at all - died when the
specific stone was transported, or a famous sailor brought it in, the value of
the rai stone increases.
Rai stones were used in social transactions such as marriage,
inheritance, political deals, sign of an alliance, ransom of the battle dead or
just in exchange for food. Many of them are placed in front of meetinghouses or
specific pathways. Though the ownership of a particular stone changes, the
stone itself is rarely moved. The names of previous owners are passed down to
the new one.
According to a Economist (1999) article titled “Paper Money”, Sweden was the first
country in Europe to introduce paper money in 1661 and other countries joined
later.,
In 1694 the Bank of England started printing paper money used to be
known as "running cash notes”
With increase in international trade, gold became universally accepted
commodity to back issuance of paper money. This led to the emergence of gold
standard. During 1870, major countries agreed to hold gold to back their
currency notes. The value of any country’s banknotes depended on the gold
reserve held by a country and exchange rates
between two currencies depended on the amount of gold backed by
respective currencies. The gold standard existed until the First World War.
During 1944, Bretton Woods Agreement system came
into existence. The
Bretton
Woods Conference of
1944 established an international fixed exchange rate regime in which currencies
were pegged to the US Dollar, which in turn was based on the gold standard. Bretton Woods agreement is considered as the most important
economic and political
accomplishment of the cold ware era. Gavin (1996) in paper titled “The legends of Bretton Woods” noted “Bretton woods is the most revered name
in international monetary history, perhaps in economic history”. As part of the agreement, from 1944
till 1971 , different countries permitted the exchange rates to vary within a
narrow band. Central governments needed to intervene in the forex market
regularly to keep the exchange rate within the band. However, this led to
substantial imbalances in the forex rates i.e, some currencies became
undervalued and some became overvalued.
However significant changes have happened during 1971.
The Smithsonian
Agreement in 1971, countries were
allowed to increase the band within which currency
rates can fluctuate (from 1 % to 2.25%). In this agreement, the member
countries i.e, Group Ten also decided to devalue US$ against most other
currencies. The Smithsonian Agreement of 1973 completely abandoned the band and
currencies became “free float”.
Even though major changes were brought in 1973, but visible changes in
forex market only began to emerge in 1978, when worldwide currencies were
allowed to 'float' according to supply and demand. In 1992, twelve European
countries joined common currency called Euro.
In a “floating
exchange rate system”, supply and demand situation influences the
exchange rate. Though we see great deal of volatility in exchange rate, rarely
any country has pure free floating exchange rate. Most governments through
their central banks influence the exchange rate by changing their interest
rates and adopting other means of control. Many-a-times exchange rate changes
when governors of central banks or high ranking officials of a central bank
just even casually remarks about whether their currency is under/overvalued.
To sum it up, the fixed/semi-fixed vs, floating exchange rate
system can be differentiated as follows:
In fixed/semi-fixed exchange rate system, exchange rate is maintained at
a specific level or fluctuates within a given range. In such exchange rate
system, the central banks play a crucial role and regularly buy and sell
foreign currency to maintain the exchange rate. Also the central banks dictate
the rate of interest so that the exchange rate remains at a given value or
remains within the range. This system provides great deal of advantage to
exporters and importers as they are not exposed to forex risk.
Fully fixed and fully floating exchange rates are at the two ends of
broad spectrum of exchange rate systems prevailing in different countries.
However, rarely a country will have fully fixed or fully floating exchange rate
system.
In a fully fixed exchange rate, there could divergence between the
official rate and the currency true value. If the divergence is significant, a
parallel “black market” starts operating where the currency’s true value is
reflected. Periodically, the government of the country with fixed exchange rate
has to revalue or devalue the official rate. Similarly, very few countries have
fully floating exchange rate system. Central banks periodically intervene in
currency market to align the currency within an acceptable range. If a country’s
central bank aggressively intervenes to keep the exchange under control, then
this is known as “dirty float” currency regime. In most cases,
central banks interventions are more of symbolic in nature i.e., to send a
message to the market participants regarding the true value of the currency.
In a floating exchange rate system, the exchange rate is determined
mainly through supply and demand. Hence, export-import balance, capital flows,
country’s fiscal deficit etc. governs the exchange rate. Fluctuating exchange
rate poses significant forex risk to the exporter and importers of the country.
Floating rate system led to the increase in forex trading. Initially
forex trading was undertaken mostly by banks and large multinational
corporations. But with the proliferation of the internet, individuals,
exporters, importers, mutual funds, hedge funds are actively participating in
the forex market. The spread of electronic trading platforms has led to
tremendous growth as it has enabled large financial institutions to set up
algorithmic trading systems and has provided trading facilities to retail
investors.
Comments
Post a Comment